this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2026
406 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

86780 readers
3883 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Citing backlash, ISBNdb removed its webpages about training AI, denied ever buying, scanning, or selling a book for AI training, and said the site was a "test of market interest."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 77 points 1 day ago (5 children)

In ISBNdb’s now-removed marketing materials, it admitted that getting caught destroying printed books during the scanning process would not be a good look. “The optics problem is real,” ISBNdb’s site said. “‘AI company destroys two million books’ is not a headline that generates sympathy.”

So their solution was to do the evil thing secretly?

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago

I am convinced of that. They only feared bad press but they have no reason whatsoever to stop.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 18 points 1 day ago

In the corporate world, optics are ethics.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 15 points 1 day ago

They say we shouldn't attribute to malice what could be attributed to stupidity, let's try that :

"Wait, people searching for books don't like that we help destroy real books en masse to feed the infinite fake book machines? Oh, my bad, we hadn't realized, we're not doing that then."

Yeah, I'm not absolutely convinced.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

AI companies know that the public loves books so they tried to hide their shame. Their next approach will be to make us hate books so destroying them is fine. Stories will be lauded while the book format will be dismissed. Many discussions and comparisons of "book vs (insert media)" will start to pop up. Just watch.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago

The "evil thing" is to sell a back catalog of physical books that they can't move on the retail or wholesale markets.

Idk why people are heavily invested in books moldering in a warehouse. It's not some kind of virtue that we have this staggering overproduction of physical media that we've horded for nobody in particular.

If doing this thing just results in people screaming at them, of course they're going to take down their advertisements. But of course they're going to keep doing it. Why would they stop? Who else buys a bunch of first print draft copies of books that never sold?