this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2026
252 points (96.0% liked)

memes

22196 readers
3005 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MidsizedSedan@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago (6 children)

Is it worth watching on a big screen while knowing next to nothing about the source material? (I downloaded the epub. 1000+ pages. Yep, that's gonna take a while)

I enjoyed Oppenheimer more in my computer chair and computer monitor vs the big screen and boring chair. Plus at home I can freely pause and get snacks.

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I saw it in IMAX, and I honestly don't think it would have mattered to me if I'd seen it in a regular theater. It still feels like an event that would be missing something if I'd seen it at home first, but it was lacking any real visual spectacle. It's a well-made film, but there were no blockbuster holy shit eyecandy moments.

That's one of two major gripes I have with the movie.

My second gripe is entirely to do with a pretty egregious diversion from the source material, specifically with Athena. Zendaya is great, but Athena is supposed to wear a helmet. That's her whole look. Having a helmetless Athena is like if they'd given the cyclops two eyes.

So your lack of knowledge about the source material won't work against you, and seeing it on a small screen should be fine if that's what you're into.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 15 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I opted to watch the 70mm version because it is the one experience you cannot get at home. I recommend doing so.

PS: Literally nobody is talking about it but John Leguizamo deserves praise. He had a major role and I didn't even know he was in the movie until he showed up.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

John Wick opened my eyes. Leguizamo has really shown off his ability to subtly add to scenes. He is consistently one of the most impressive actors in movies he has a role and stands out despite the screen time he has.

[–] Captain_Buddha@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

I have loved Leguizamo since 'house of buggin'" from back in the 90's... you are right to give a nod to his performance.

[–] Whelks_chance@lemmy.world 16 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Knowing anything about source material just seems to irritate people.

Watching it as a standalone film, it's just some big flashy set pieces, and too many bad things happening to dogs for no good reason.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 10 points 12 hours ago

...too many bad things happening to dogs for no good reason.

The movie is full of dramatic and moving scenes, but that final little tail wag was the only bit that got the waterworks from me.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

I'm told it's definitely worth it. None of my friends remember the book. They enjoyed it.

[–] Kennystillalive@feddit.org 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

For the Odyssey? Yes, it's a great and entertaining film. It's not really historically acurate or anything, but it is fun and the actors do a great job. Depending what type of movie enjoyer you are, you might wanna watch it in the theatres. Personally, for action movies I emjoy the cinema the most, for slower movies I enjoy them at home the best.

[–] Captain_Buddha@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Man, the whole "historically accurate" aspect is where everyone should suspend disbelief. Giant cyclop's, sirens, and God's aren't real either... and that was the most badass looking representation of King Agamemnon I've seen. That includes Brian Cox!

[–] Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

But it is not accurate to the source material either

[–] Captain_Buddha@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

No, not awfully accurate to the source material. BUT it's not actually history, so... that part stands for me. Artistic license is okay in my book.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

If you were thinking about it I recommend Imax, but it leaves Imax after this Thursday. Most movies only get a few weeks in Imax before the next new movie takes its place. It was really good and the experience was worth going out for. I loved Oppenheimer as well, but seeing it at home was definitely ok for that one.

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

70mm showings at least are coming back in September

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I checked the closest imax 70mm by me and that one doesnt seem to be leaving like the regular imax ones are.