775
submitted 1 year ago by thenexusofprivacy to c/technology@lemmy.ml

Charlie Jane Anders discusses KOSA (the Kids Online Safety Act).

If you're in the US, https://www.stopkosa.com/ makes it easy to contact your Senators and ask them to oppose KOSA.

"A new bill called the Kids Online Safety Act, or KOSA, is sailing towards passage in the Senate with bipartisa>n support. Among other things, this bill would give the attorney general of every state, including red states, the right to sue Internet platforms if they allow any content that is deemed harmful to minors. This clause is so vaguely defined that attorneys general can absolutely claim that queer content violates it — and they don't even need to win these lawsuits in order to prevail. They might not even need to file a lawsuit, in fact. The mere threat of an expensive, grueling legal battle will be enough to make almost every Internet platform begin to scrub anything related to queer people.

The right wing Heritage Foundation has already stated publicly that the GOP will use this provision to remove any discussions of trans or queer lives from the Internet. They're salivating over the prospect.

And yep, I did say this bill has bipartisan support. Many Democrats have already signed on as co-sponsors. And President Joe Biden has urged lawmakers to pass this bill in the strongest possible terms."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SlopppyEngineer@discuss.tchncs.de 89 points 1 year ago

And then everybody slaps a "Only for 18+, fill in your birth day" on their site and nobody can legally claim it's harming children.

[-] Kikkertje@aussie.zone 75 points 1 year ago

And suddenly everyone was born on Jan 1st, 2000

[-] sunbytes@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

I'm not doing maths to keep it at 18 each year.

I do 1900 lol

[-] Supermuff@feddit.de 28 points 1 year ago

You still live in 2018?

People born in 2000 are 23

[-] sunbytes@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

I didn't say I was going to do maths for you either ;)

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

It has more the implication that there are either an incredible amount of +120 year olds, or their system sucks.

[-] fushuan@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

I'm well over 18 and I give the year field a good scroll down to be like 80y/o because it's such a bother to click 3 sliders. F that.

[-] Asudox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Funny how websites actually accept that birthyear.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Was curious, so I looked it up. The oldest living people were born in 1907 currently.

[-] wagoner@infosec.pub 47 points 1 year ago

Which you will need to prove by sending your personal identification to a commercial third party provider. Who will eventually get hacked and your data will be leaked.

[-] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 42 points 1 year ago

This is how it works on YouTube now, the rules for kids content are draconic and you risk your account, so everybody just says "this is not for kids" on all videos.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 19 points 1 year ago

YouTube music will not let you put a “for kids” marked song on a playlist! It kind of sucks for putting my KID’s favorite goofy songs on my KID’s playlist. The kid’s playlist that is composed entirely of content not marked “for kids” because that’s all that is possible.

[-] Tech_Issus@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

Fun fact, press the three dots on the video and you still get the option to add it to a playlist!

[-] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

This is the adult tour, it's not FOR kids

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago

this law requires positive proof with IDs. it's also going to be used by red states to go after online queer communities.

I'm curious how that's going to work in international context. Everything to do with the queer community suddenly has a link to .ca or .mx domain and server park outside the country where this doesn't apply for example. Or reddit suddenly checks with the authorities in Zimbabwe if the ID is valid.

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

lol the US doesn't care about international law

There were enough American companies having an office in Ireland to avoid taxes. And soon also to avoid red state litigation.

[-] silent_water@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

the US controls the international money supply. the loopholes employed by those companies are very easily closed as is the ability of companies headquartered outside the US to operate within its borders. companies will fall in line. and any support granted by other countries are easily neutered by shocking the money supply.

this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
775 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

35003 readers
180 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS