this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
14 points (73.3% liked)

micromobility - Bikes, scooters, boards: Whatever floats your goat, this is micromobility

3245 readers
37 users here now

Ebikes, bicycles, scooters, skateboards, longboards, eboards, motorcycles, skates, unicycles, heelies, or an office chair: Whatever floats your goat, this is all things micromobility!

"Transportation using lightweight vehicles such as bicycles or scooters, especially electric ones that may be borrowed as part of a self-service rental program in which people rent vehicles for short-term use within a town or city.

micromobility is seen as a potential solution to moving people more efficiently around cities"

Recall warnings available here.

Feel free to also check out

!utilitycycling@slrpnk.net

!bikewrench@lemmy.world

!bikecommuting@lemmy.world

!bikepacking@lemmy.world

!electricbikes@lemmy.world

!bicycle_touring@lemmy.world

!notjustbikes@feddit.nl

!longboard@lemmy.world

It's a little sad that we need to actually say this, but:

Don't be an asshole or you will be permanently banned.

Respectful debate is totally OK, criticizing a product is fine, but being verbally abusive will not be tolerated.

Focus on discussing the idea, not attacking the person.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] egerlach@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The main argument here is "if you can go as fast as traffic then you are more like traffic". Not Just Bikes did a 1.5 hour treatment on how US/Canadian bike infrastructure got the way it did, and the one man responsible: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pRPduRHBhHI

TL;DWThis guy believed that only "real cyclists" should be riding, i.e. people who ride racing bikes as fast as they can. Casual riders need not apply. He wrote a book on how to design streets for bikes based entirely around "real cyclists". It's commonly used today. The infrastructure it recommends is dangerous for most actual people who bike, so no one bikes. The video is a great 1.5 hr rant though, very entertaining.

Point is, this article falls into the trap of accepting the whole "real cyclist" framing of the argument. If there's separate bike infrastructure, then the idea of needing speed to integrate with car traffic goes away, and the whole article is moot.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

100% agree with you and NJB except that e-bikes that can go 30+ MPH should just bite the bullet and be regulated like motorcycles.

The single vehicle accident statistics with e-bikes are staggering. People don’t treat it as a dangerous vehicle and wear helmets at a minimum.

[–] egerlach@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Generally agree. I don't know enough of the data to say whether or not they should be motorcycles or a new category of vehicle that can be regulated separately, but I'm in favour of increased regulation and licensing as they get more powerful.

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 3 points 1 month ago

Yes, separate bike infrastructure would solve this. Though I'd argue you can drive faster once you don't have to share the road with cars and pedestrians. Sadly I don't think I'm going to get separate infrastructure anytime soon.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

That is a really important video for any cyclist in North America.