this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2025
67 points (72.8% liked)

Privacy

43982 readers
1156 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The drama and accusations the GrapheneOS developers are spewing and engaging in are giving me a bad taste in the mouth and make me doubt the OS’s reliability am I the only one?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] limer@lemmy.ml 52 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I would prefer my privacy software to be developed by people like this, rather than people who are calm and flexible

[–] paper_moon@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Its all fine until their approach of privacy or security differs with what's best for the project, then there's no reasoning with them to fix it because they're not calm and flexible. Then ya gotta fork it and get everyone to transition to the new fork, and get developers back onboard, etc.

A crazy, but pointed example of something like this could be: the dude could just claim grapheneos going forward will not have networking anymore because thats an attack vector, and at that point the project doesn't even suite anyone's needs to be used as a smartphone anymore. How are you gonna reason with someone like this that, while keeping networking in the project is an attack vector, its necessary to be able to use the project for it's intended use case? You probably aren't

[–] PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The guy being paranoid asshole is passable, what I thought a really shit move is calling the community to create alt accs to harass people from other projects and saying he will ban anyone that complains. The Rossmann video is quite shocking, you see the dev's complete disassociation with reality... yeah the code is open, but how many people outside the project are really auditing it? Even people inside the project, are they auditing each others' work? If the guy doesn't get treatment, how long until he decides his own userbase is after him?

[–] ganymede@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

admittedly i'm not up to date on all the drama, but i thought that graphene saw themselves as victims of alt attacks?

[–] PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

So yeah, it seems like he accuses everyone of persecuting and harassing him, but in those videos there are several examples of what he considers persecuting and harassing. Both channels were highly supportive of the project and actively promoted it, but because they would also promote other projects and do benchmark tests, they were "spreading misinformation", "being biased", "campaigning against him" and so on. And in the second video he accused the guy of campaigning against him just for saying "This is informative, and unfortunate" about the first video lol. So him being a "victim" is just his lack of proper medication, because anyone who asked him about such attacks, if he had prints or so, was also accused of attacking him lol

https://youtu.be/Dx7CZ-2Bajg
https://youtu.be/4To-F6W1NT0

Undoubtly GrapheneOS is the best project out there, so yeah, this is unfortunate.

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Strange, I put the same link in one of my comments and a mod removed it.

[–] JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, the minority is harassing the majority. Hmm, very logical.

[–] PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Very documented.

edit: removing the rest of the message because it was a misunderstanding.

[–] deacon3484@infosec.exchange 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@PiraHxCx @JamesBoeing737MAX
Pls link the x post you mentioned before wrongly referencing me as a Gos fake account

[–] PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sorry, as the acc had no previous interaction with anything but that post I assumed it was a disposable acc. The screenshot of that comment is in the very same article, but you can also check it here https://nitter.net/GrapheneOS/status/1991610031478042948#m (nitter frontend link)

[–] deacon3484@infosec.exchange 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@PiraHxCx
I didn't know they made such claim. I don't think there's any evidence indicating eOS has French government backdoors.

[–] PiraHxCx@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Sorry again about referencing you as a fake acc, there is a screenshot I'm hunting now about a call to users to create disposable accs to respond to social media posts that will give a better context for my assumption, but I removed the whole content of that previous post anyway.