Gaming

Assuming you're referring to F&H 1, that came out five years before Steam reviewed this game. It's possible they simply became more strict over time and never revisited F&H because it never came up.

Also, Steam's rules (or any other private platform's rules) are not law. Precedent doesn't really matter. They can decide arbitrarily when rules apply and don't apply (so long as they don't violate anti-competition laws and so on). One would hope they are consistent, but being an organization with likely multiple reviewers, it's unlikely they are always in sync, especially with decisions separated by years.

A different question to ask is whether the scene you described would have passed review in 2023. I haven't played F&H, but based on your description, it seems unlikely.