this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
169 points (92.9% liked)

Games

44143 readers
1013 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Currently, only GOG and Itch are still selling this game.

EDIT: It seems the game has returned to Humble Bundle.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] markz@suppo.fi 92 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

It was a child doing pony play, riding a naked adult man-horse. The dev claimed it was not sexual.

This was removed later but it's the build you send for review that gets reviewed. Other stores got a later version, hence why it passed on those.

Dev was not given a chance to remove it as it turns out steam has a policy that anything that resembles CSAM gets denied permanently.

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I haven't heard about the details, what's your source on that?

As far as I recall, the developer said he didn't know the actual reason for the ban.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 31 points 3 weeks ago

Some previous article which contained valve's response, and a description of the scene. I didn't find it immediately, but I'll check again.

[–] dukemirage@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] markz@suppo.fi 29 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Child Sexual Abuse Material. Legalese for child porn and adjacent things.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I also was wondering why, it's always been called CP and then recently they changed acronym 🤷

[–] TrippaSnippa@aussie.zone 33 points 3 weeks ago

Calling it "porn" makes it sound more legitimate and less like the heinous abuse that it really is.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Like the other user said, porn implies some level of consent which children cannot give. Calling it csam ensures there's no confusion about it being abuse.

[–] Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

Pretty sure it's child sexual abuse material

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Considering there website proudly shows it is banned on Steam I'm sure this was done on purpose for the publicity.

Why did Epic ban it though? They didn't get the 'tainted' preview version and normally love to have games that aren't on Steam.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 4 points 3 weeks ago

Anything's possible but I wouldn't assume it was planned unless something else came up. I think he's just riding the accidental publicity, which I don't really blame him for, though the dishonesty of his spin kinda pisses me off.

I'd like to hear epic's explanation on why the clean version was still too much.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

It might not be what they planned but they're now using it as an opportunity for more publicity to get something out of it especially now there are some potential sales they won't be getting anymore.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Does being naked make something sexual? I would argue that for content to be sexual it has to have intent to cause arousal.

The fact that it vaguely resembles fetish content does not in and of it's self make it fetish content.

The trailers i have seen for this game do not seem to intend to cause arousal, they seem to want to make the player empathize with the plight of domesticated animals

[–] markz@suppo.fi 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I can believe the the dev in that it wasn't intended to be sexual. But should intent excuse otherwise unacceptable content? Valve says it depicts a sexual interaction, though that seems to be debated a lot.

My own opinion is that it's too close, and that this is the kind of boundary shouldn't be pushed. Despite intentions, the dev really should have known better than to send in anything that could be interpreted as even remotely pedo content.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But should intent excuse otherwise unacceptable content

Define unacceptable? It's subjective. A lot of people had a problem with the cover for Nirvanas Nevermind.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

It's been about sexual abuse. I'm going to call it universally unacceptable.

Does it count? I find it just kinda sexually icky, and I think it would be harmful to the child. If you think it'd be fine, not even in the gray area, then I guess there's no argument there anymore.