742
submitted 1 year ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] fidodo@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

How long would it take us to be carbon neutral if we took all that and put it in green energy?

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Not an economist. My guess, 2 -4 years. Cut subsidies to oil, methane, natural gas. Incentivize and subsidize renewables. The market reacts quickly.

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That’s the thing. Governments and corporations tell us that we need to give up our luxuries. That we need to recycle. That we need to do this and do that when what we do is a piss in the ocean compared to what they do while they spend our fucking money to do it.

I can reduce, reuse, recycle til the cows come home but it doesn’t fucking matter when all my options to buy products come in containers that harm the planet.

Pisses me off to no end.

[-] ErilElidor@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

I watched some video some time ago where they put that in perspective: If I stopped causing any climate negative emissions now and for the rest of my life, it would amount to like 1 second emitted by the top 100 companies (not 100% sure about the numbers exactly, but it's basically the same order of magnitude).

I'm not saying that we should stop caring about it at all, but it's much much more important to try and steer politics into the right direction, than it is to change personally. Still, do all you can personally, but imo it's fine to "cheat" here and there.

[-] fidodo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Very true, I put my effort towards trying to reducing my waste rather than gas electric and water. One thing I do think people should change is reducing how much meat they consume though, specifically beef. That produces a lot of bad environmental effects like deforestation and runoff.

[-] entropicdrift 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It would require mineral extraction at a scale larger than any in human history to build that many batteries, solar panels, windmills, etc.

Considering the scale of the project a decade would be very optimistic.

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If you want to pay for the new stove, furnace, water heater, and the electric upgrades I'd need for that, please do. I picked gas over electric because I didn't have the wiring necessary to get electric. If it was cost effective to go with electric, I would.

[-] fidodo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

That's the idea. 7 trillion dollars per year is a lot of money and that stuff is where some of it would go.

[-] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

This is exactly the reasoning that big corporations have

What about MEEEEEE?!?

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
742 points (98.8% liked)

World News

38492 readers
3229 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS