this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2025
1213 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

83348 readers
183 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I don't think there's any pride in it, they are just going after what is the most profitable at any given time.

That's exactly why I suspect they will choose to resurrect the Crucial name later, because given a choice between launching a new name nobody knows, or a name people recognise (even if it's been tarred a bit) then recognised will be the winning and more profitable option.

That is, if they haven't sold the Crucial name to someone else first.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 months ago

I can see both happening.
I'd say: We will see (thumbsup)

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

China's CXMT might go for it. Apparently they are rolling out DDR5 8000+ memory, two or three years from now. They can rebrand as Crucial for the western market, thus using familiarity to push their product.

"Crucial's Xtreme Memory Technology will push your Steam Machine beyond the limits, dddduuuuude!" 🤘