this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2025
697 points (88.4% liked)

memes

18570 readers
2591 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

AI pic.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space 54 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

TIL there's only 3 outfits billionaires can wear in public.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

they're even wearing the same fucking shoes!!!

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 35 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's pretty obvious, they're all wearing their "presentation clothes". The llm put them in those clothes because that's what they wear in the media is has most indexed.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Not like they can wear those clothes in public then, right?

They are way too flamboyant for every day use!

/s

Really, no better argument on why it is obvious?

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

You made the argument for me. Under what circumstances would all of them be in a parking lot in a circle all wearing the clothes they're most famously seen on stage in? Why aren't any of them wearing a t shirt or have a hat or wearing red? It's convincing because it's exactly what you expect to see.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is a real thing, brands jockey for top position on one of their bodies because it can influence the rest of the group and trickle down into their tech leadership. Articles have been written about it but it's usually ugly shoes and very discreet, unlabeled sweaters that cost $5k. It's really sad because they're so fucking vapid, there's not much else to do, and they don't have a lot of real friends.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They have zero real friends, and no one loves them, save their young kids before the kids catch on. The one exception might be Warren Buffett, but that is not to imply that he is a good person.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Warren Buffett disowned his granddaughter for having the temerity to speak with on camera about the family's excessive wealth, with one of the Johnson & Johnson heirs.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

To be fair, Jensen Huang has worn that exact same thing every day for decades, heh.