this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2025
101 points (98.1% liked)

Europe

6399 readers
55 users here now

Europe

Rules:

  1. All sources allowed. Voting decides what is reliable unless
  2. Articles which have been proven false beyond any doubt may be removed
  3. No personal attacks
  4. Posts in English, translations allowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
101
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml to c/europe@lemmy.ml
 

The only thing I'm slghtly concerned about is proposition #2. I hope that gets struck down due to its censorship potential.

IE. No ChatGPT for toddlers


https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20251120IPR31496/children-should-be-at-least-16-to-access-social-media-say-meps

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

In the EU framework, the certifying authorities are the same that issue your passport, your driving license; the state. I fail to see the issue with allowing them to issue another proof of who I am.

The risk is tracking. The way the EU mandates this framework is built requires zero knowledge built into the system. Then you can definitely say “they lie”, but if you believe your government would lie about this, then you already believe they would lie about all the other million ways they could track you, if it wasn’t illegal for them to do so. You’re really not giving up anything you haven’t already given up when the national state was formed as a concept. And in this case we gain a lot, namely keeping profit and “engagement” out of having a conversation online. Eventually you have to trust someone - I’d prefer my democratically elected government (but I acknowledge that I live in places where I have that luxury).

[–] moonshadow@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago

Still can't say I agree, but would like to thank you for the insight into your position and wish you luck out there