this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2025
101 points (98.1% liked)

Europe

6399 readers
55 users here now

Europe

Rules:

  1. All sources allowed. Voting decides what is reliable unless
  2. Articles which have been proven false beyond any doubt may be removed
  3. No personal attacks
  4. Posts in English, translations allowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
101
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml to c/europe@lemmy.ml
 

The only thing I'm slghtly concerned about is proposition #2. I hope that gets struck down due to its censorship potential.

IE. No ChatGPT for toddlers


https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20251120IPR31496/children-should-be-at-least-16-to-access-social-media-say-meps

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

I, as an Australian, have been saying all along that the social media ban should focus on the addictive and problematic features of social media, rather than a blanket ban. Hell there was a good quote I saw recently on Bluesky by Lance MacDonald:

"People saying "kids will find a way around this" have no idea what "this" is. When it comes to YouTube, there's nothing for them to find a way around. The government is forcing all kids to have raw unfiltered access to YouTube. The only thing they're removing is parental controls."

The EU is at least acknowledging the harmful elements. Here's hoping they go "ban on the harmful features of social media without age verification". Then again if the Google Play Store can serve as a middleman on that front then Google will get their wish of being an internet gatekeeper and these features will be enabled by default even for adults (which it shouldn't be).