this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2025
146 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1867 readers
1039 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Even if it hadn't been adopted by white supremacists (it has), it would still be abhorrent.

yes, it is abhorrent… it’s not, however, a white supremacist symbol.
“crusader” is a terrible term for the military to associate itself with… but definitely not as terrible as a white supremacist symbol.
white supremacists have also “adopted” wearing boots but i’m not going to call everyone wearing boots a white supremacist.

[–] minnism@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So is the swastika a Nazi symbol or not?

[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

well yes and no.
it was obviously their official symbol and on their flags, buttons, and everything else.
But it was also ripped off and meant different things to different cultures for thousands of years.
but to answer the loaded part of your question:
Some white supremacist’s use of the crusader cross is not at all like the nazi’s use of the swastika

[–] minnism@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Oh, so how many need to use it until it does become a symbol of white supremacy?

[–] OutForARip@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Well you'd at least need it to be tattooed onto the chest of the second in command of the worlds largest armed forces in the world, in a country that's rapidly pivoted towards white Christian nationalism.

So it's safe to say this isn't about white supremacy.

[–] ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] minnism@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, I thought it might be something like that.