I follow the Marxist definition, Russian nationalism has nothing to do with it, and moreover we are speaking of western imperialists kicked out by Russian nationalists. Revolution has succeeded on far worse odds.

[–] harcesz@szmer.info -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You are talking about them since its a topic your brought up. And honestly I dont understand why you belive that people exploited by their own are better of then exploited by foreigners, but I really don't care for your dialectic explenation. Just hope you get out of that sect before you waste to much of your life trying to convince online strangers that what you read is true. Have fun, I'm off for some parxis and partying.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's simple, nationalists want development for greater profits while imperialists want underdevelopment to retain their superprofits.

[–] harcesz@szmer.info -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Go find that development in Russia. Its about 50km deep from the western border. Many areas have actually regressed compared to 90s or particularly early 80. Has to be noted that they were better of due to imperialist exploitation of satellite states, but you cover your ears and start screeching for that so whatever. But yeah, I'm out. Cya next time, same prorussian propaganda threads.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

In lots of ways the Russian Federation is behind the USSR, no doubt. Capitalism doesn't work. That being said, it's far better than being on the plundered side of imperialism, and that's why UR has the support it still does. The CPRF rising is a consequence of rising support for socialism.