this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2025
124 points (98.4% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
7722 readers
552 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Ford should roll back truck plans, not EV plans.
most truck drivers don't fucking need a truck, and might be just as happy with smaller vehicles if Ford hadn't stopped fucking building them.
Focus and Fiesta were great cars, especially in hatch/wagon form. Should be good enough for most people.
make rangers compact again
Then they will go broke, the F150 is one of the world's best selling vehicles and the only reason why Ford isn't bankrupt.
Bullshit, they were awful, because of cheaply designed automatic transmissions that failed repeatedly and Ford kept selling them for 7 years. Even in the sport Focus, they had major engine failures due to poor head gasket design. Focus and Fiesta were top sellers worldwide, but Ford so badly fucked their customers they got out of the car business, now only making the Mustang Boomermobile.
ah I wasn't aware of that, the Fiesta ST we had was a manual so we didn't have much reason to know about that issue.
I've still yet to find anyone who is able to post any data except a 2018 axios hit piece about trucks not being used properly or being happy with the use case.
So for the thousandths time on Reddit/Lemmy, what data are you using to form that opinion?
How about you provide evidence for how something which burns through far more finite resources than necessary is somehow better for society?
On top of having far worse visibility, taking up too much space on roads and parking lots, and being responsible for more pedestrian deaths than smaller, more reasonably proportioned vehicles?
Look at you, going off on a tangent.
So to be clear, you do not have the data to back up the opinion, right?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437522000810
https://www.npr.org/2023/11/14/1212737005/cars-trucks-pedestrian-deaths-increase-crash-data