this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2025
636 points (98.2% liked)

me_irl

7032 readers
289 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

How exactly do they advertise the cups? Because my local legislation would demand that if they said a "400ml Coke" I need to get 400ml of liquid Coke, regardless of the size of the container or the ice. But if they sneakily say "do you want a 400ml CUP" and later on you decide what goes inside the cup, then yes.

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s just “a small cup”

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Over here that would still possibly be a problem depending on the expected association the customer makes.

"I want some Coke"

"Got it, and will that be a medium?"

"What size is a medium?"

"400ml"

Then the implicit expectation is 400ml of the Coke being ordered

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"What size is a medium?"

They'd just grab the cup to show you. Where do you live that the workers would actually reply to you with the actual measurement?

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] cabbage@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Also in Europe it would be totally normal to respond with measurements. 200 ml, 0.33, and half liter are the standard ones. In the UK there's pints and half pints.

If somebody just pointed at the container for me instead of telling me the size I would probably consider it weird. Maybe it's normal in fast food joints.

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I believe in America the corporation is given the edge. “We didn’t say you’d get 400ml of coke, we said a medium was 400ml.” Is a legally viable argument. Its only false advertising if taking the statement at face value is provably false, a la “Red Bull gives you wings” was changed to “Red bull gives you wiiiings” because the original was provably false, and the second one can be defended as “wiiiings isn’t a real word so it doesn’t mean anything”

[–] KingGordon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

We are way beyond punishing folks for false advertising, sadly.