this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
1006 points (99.3% liked)
Funny
12676 readers
608 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I had reason to use an optical drive lately, and even that was a blast from the past. Hitting eject, watching the light blink and then the drawer opens. USB-based storage just isn't the same.
I regularly use optical drives for the movies. Why should I pay twice the price to "buy" some movie from Apple or Google? I rather wait 2 days for the mailman to deliver me a Blu-ray that doesn't only have better quality, but also keeps working when some company decides to stop licensing the stuff I purportedly "bought". Second-hand discs sometimes cost as much as 1€.
But well, I might be a bit old school, as I just got a few new vinyls delivered to me the other day.
Something I recently learned: it is outright impossible to legally play 4k blu rays on PC.
When you're old enough to buy physical media, your eyes have gone bad enough that you don't need 4k 8-)
Funnily enough, the main place I worry about resolution is on a desktop computer doing desktop computer stuff. My 1440p ultrawide is kind of decadent for games, but when I'm doing something I just want a bunch of real estate.
Just watching TV or movies...honestly I think I might like lower resolutions more. I've got a copy of Master and Commander on "fullscreen" DVD, 480p 4:3. I'd really like it to be 16:9 but I can't come up with complaints about the video quality. I get immersed in that movie just fine at DVD quality. I've got a few films on Blu-Ray, and at 1080p film grain starts being noticeable. And the graininess of the shot changes from scene to scene as the film crew had to use different film stock and camera settings for different lighting conditions, so I spend the whole movie going "That scene looks pretty good, oh that's grainy as hell, now it's better." Lower resolutions and/or bitrates smooth that out, but I think they actively preserve it on Blu-Ray because the data fits on the disc, there's no internet pipe to push it down, and film grain is "authentic."
So at 4k, it's either going to display a level of detail that I'm sitting too far from the screen to notice, it's going to look even noisier, or it'll be smeared by compression rather than resolution because of bitrate limitations. So...?