this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2025
148 points (97.4% liked)

Comics

7765 readers
56 users here now

This is a community for everything comics related! A place for all comics fans.

Rules:

1- Do not violate lemmy.ml site-wide rules

2- Be civil.

3- If you are going to post NSFW content that doesn't violate the lemmy.ml site-wide rules, please mark it as NSFW and add a content warning (CW). This includes content that shows the killing of people and or animals, gore, content that talks about suicide or shows suicide, content that talks about sexual assault, etc. Please use your best judgement. We want to keep this space safe for all our comic lovers.

4- No Zionism or Hasbara apologia of any kind. We stand with Palestine πŸ‡΅πŸ‡Έ . Zionists will be banned on sight.

5- The moderation team reserves the right to remove any post or comments that it deems a necessary for the well-being and safety of the members of this community, and same goes with temporarily or permanently banning any user.

Guidelines:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Hot take: if this is the case why do developing nations have significantly higher birth rates than developed ones?

[–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago

It could be a combination of factors, one of them being religiosity and lack of access to birth control.

[–] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Education. When people know reproduction is not the only goal in life then people will actually start to weigh pros and cons before making the decision to have kids.

[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

I'm not sure if it's specifically knowing weather or not reproduction is the only goal in life but I do agree it's an education issue. I'm arguing that It's not about being poor it's about education.

[–] cornishon@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In undeveloped (overexploited) countries, children are a promise of a better future for poor families. Also in those countries the capitalist concept of nuclear family is not as entrenched, so you have the support of the whole community in rising children.

[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

That is a good point.

I mean it is a no brainer that if people are given a significant break from work (not just maternity/paternity leave for a few months or even a couple of years), and have the ability for there parents to help look after there children people would be more inclined to have kids.

What about developing socialist nations? Since there isn't the same level of exploitation are there birth rates lower?

Edit: it's 2.08 in Venezuela, 1.45 in cuba, 1.91 in vietnam, 2.24 in laos. So can confirm socialist countries have a much more moderate birth rate when compared to the rest of the developing world, as well as a higher birth rate compared to most of the developed world.