Self Hosted - Self-hosting your services.

17107 readers

5 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules

No harassment
crossposts from c/Open Source & c/docker & related may be allowed, depending on context
Video Promoting is allowed if is within the topic.
No spamming.
Stay friendly.
Follow the lemmy.ml instance rules.
Tag your post. (Read under)

Important

Lemmy doesn't have tags yet, so mark it with [Question], [Help], [Project], [Other], [Promoting] or other you may think is appropriate. This is strongly encouraged!

Cross-posting

!everything_git@lemmy.ml is allowed!
!docker@lemmy.ml is allowed!
!portainer@lemmy.ml is allowed!
!fediverse@lemmy.ml is allowed if topic has to do with selfhosting.
!selfhosted@lemmy.ml is allowed!

If you see a rule-breaker please DM the mods!

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

Zoe8338@lemmy.ml

dogmuffins@lemmy.ml

testman@lemmy.ml

Traefik (and eventually Vaultwarden when I get there) (lemmy.ml)

submitted 3 days ago by trilobite@lemmy.ml to c/selfhost@lemmy.ml

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've tried unsuccessfully to get Valutwarden working without a proxy. See here. Any request with https leads me to the SSL_ERROR_RX_RECORD_TOO_LONG error, while via http I get the "Loading wheel" running indefinitely.

Despite the top of the page here suggests you can run Valutwarden without internally without proxy, my experience suggest that this is not the case and have tried on different VMs getting the same error. So seems like the only way is going via proxy. From what I've read, people seem to suggest that Traefik is the way to go. So I'm thinking of setting it up on my same VM as Valutwarden.

Note that my network is behind a pfsense install on another hardware machine. DNS forwarding is enabled with unbound. Will installing Traefik require changes to pfSense config? Looks like it may be the case from here. For now all I want is getting Vaultwarden going; later down the line I'll learn how Traefik can benefit the rest of my homelab.

I'm trying to work out the simplest way of getting Vaultwarden going using a minimalistic proxy, as there seems to be no alternative to not having a proxy going. Thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] passepartout@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

I like both very much for what they are and would confirm that Caddy is a lot easier for beginners. The only downside is that you have to rebuild the binary with caddyx for more functionality which can be limiting e.g. for people wanting to start with dns challenges for (wildcard) certificates.