this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
164 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26808 readers
2327 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trade war with Canada has contributed to a significant decline in U.S. liquor sales

Jim Beam, owned by Suntory Global Spirits, is one of Kentucky’s biggest bourbon producers.

Kentucky went for tRump by 64.47%. Guess they're getting what they voted for.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Elon Musk is a poor person? His family were poor? What sort of alternate reality do you live in?

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What are you even talking about?

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You must not have read my original comment that you replied to about Darwin, so I'll repost here for you convenience.

If Darwinism had properly and rightfully claimed the apartheid-supporting parents of Musk, we wouldn’t have had to deal with the shitstain that is Elon

Here's the Darwinian force I meant that family's mentality attracts:

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay? I don't have anything to add or say in response. What is a valid reply I can give you?

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So, are you saying that Elon Musk, the richest man in the world, owner of SpaceX, and who has unprecedented political power in the United States, is somehow the poor that I'm blaming? Nice try ChatGPT/Grok. Go take your AI responses elsewhere.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What did I say that gives you the impression I believe Elon Musk is a poor person? Can you quote me directly so I can help assuage your confusion?

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You said this:

Keep on blaming the poor instead of blaming the rich.

In response to this:

If Darwinism had properly and rightfully claimed the apartheid-supporting parents of Musk, we wouldn’t have had to deal with the shitstain that is Elon

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Fair, I dodnt make that easy to read in context. I ignored what you said about Musk because it was irrelevant and still is. What I wrote was in response to you celebrating the poor suffering. I ignored your musk stuff.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Okay, turning to my original post, I wrote:

We celebrate them being fucked over because they are evil. We celebrate them being fucked over because they are suffering the consequences of what they want to and are foisting on others. We are celebrating because we are miserable, but at least they’re getting it too, if not worse. We may have to eat a shit sandwich because of how much they wanted to inflict evil upon the vulnerable and minorities, but at least they’re in the pot boiling with us. Basically, crab mentality. If we’re lucky, maybe they’ll die off first and in a greater percentage.

Where in that did I explicitly relate celebratingevil getting fucked to an associationof being poor? I explicitly pointed to evil people, and I made the point about how evil people want to inflict evil on the vulnerable and minorities. Are you associating poverty as a moral character? Last I checked, poor people fall under the umbrella of vulnerable.