this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2025
867 points (99.0% liked)

World News

51431 readers
4341 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Boiling lobsters while they are alive and conscious will be banned as part of a government strategy to improve animal welfare in England.

Government ministers say that “live boiling is not an acceptable killing method” for crustaceans and alternative guidance will be published.

The practice is already illegal in Switzerland, Norway and New Zealand. Animal welfare charities say that stunning lobsters with an electric gun or chilling them in cold air or ice before boiling them is more humane.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Aww you got me.

Nothing i like more than gathering up an entire ants nest and forcing them to watch as I torture the queen by sticking pins into her.

Then when she finally does croak it, I force the other ants into a battle royale.

When there's one survivor, I crown him king ant. Then boil him alive and serve him with butter.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good for you on that. Do you imagine pesticides as mentioned before are humane?

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Depends on the method.

I know what you're trying to do mate.

If it turned out that insects felt pain and we were killing them off in the most brutal way possible for no reason then I wouldn't be happy about it.

But they don't, and we aren't.

Tell me this. Knowing that lobsters feel pain, that there are humane methods of killing them that are quick and don't involve them slowly being boiled alive and don't make any fucking difference to what comes next, why exactly are you trying to defend the practice by painting those of us who don't agree with it out to be hypocrites?

Seriously, do you WANT them to suffer? Or are you just being contrarian for the sake of argument.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 23 hours ago

But they don’t, and we aren’t.

You seem awfully sure of that. The jain would disagree with you.

Sentient means ability to perceive or feel. Bugs respond to stimuli, so that includes them.

I doubt all insecticides kill quickly with minimal suffering.

I know what you’re trying to do mate.

why exactly are you trying to defend the practice

Am I? I'm mostly ridiculing our folly when we're inconsistent, but also curious if anyone recognizing the impracticalities still has a consistent answer. Ignoring the problem isn't an answer.

by painting those of us who don’t agree with it out to be hypocrites?

Because you are unless you're consistent about it. If you have a cool answer to this conundrum, though, I think some of us are eager for it.

It makes little difference to me, so sure, kill lobsters humanely before cooking them. I'm still going to ridicule inconsistent moralizing.

I'd been telling everyone the best answer may be to deliver on the earlier designs of the ancient Mesopotamian gods[^until] to exterminate all of humanity. We'd been ruining the planet, and the other species deserve better. No one else takes that idea seriously.

[^until]: until they settled for limiting human lifespans (to a mere 120 years) & introducing infertility, altogether a bad move