World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
- Blogsites are treated in the same manner as social media sites. Medium, Blogger, Substack, etc. are not valid news links regardless of who is posting them. Yes, legitimate news sites use Blogging platforms, they also use Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube and we don't allow those links either.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
Not so. They've been observed in the ocean doing that too. Though, I don't know enough about the particular conditions they need to be in before they start doing that, or stop. Presumably (plausibly, at least, as far as I have seen (~ or at least can remember at least half clearly)), this may only occur while they're crammed in a crevice, and while they're still young and soft enough.
Wat. How widespread is this perception?
I genuinely do not think people are thinking this thought experiment through...
In being dropped into boiling water, how long before the pain's so much it triggers the happy endorphins (if that even happens for lobsters as I hear it does for humans), and how long before death and the ordeal is over entirely [someone said 40 seconds, right?] ... compared to however many orders of magnitude longer, being eaten alive, having parts of you crushed, and gnawed on, and then other parts, and more... and no guarantee of an end any time soon, and quite plausibly suffering this from tail to head, for the longest time in the ordeal still alive for it... Chances are you may not even die by the claws and gnashers of the one (or several) eating you in that first round, and may go on to suffer, maybe even a fate of starvation eventually killing you. FAR more cruel. Surely. Or does someone have a counter proposal to what it's like, from how they conceive of the thought experiment?
Anyways, still, better we just "*bosh*" on the head, over in an instant.
And, sorry to say, but, from
Sounds like you've been "Disneyed". There are many a horrendous animal on animal killings that are FAR from "incredibly efficient". ... Honestly, I do not even want to start reiterating some of the stories. There's a lot of really gruesome suffering going on that goes not get anywhere near consideration for inclusion in nature documentaries. ... But just for a few hints... Bear fights(NSFW:"chunks",brutal,srsly). Shark bites. Large cats (for some reason) eating their prey from the back end while still alive (~ and they're said to be among the most efficient apex predators? When even they will simply wear the animal down...). Non predatory animals goring and galling threat risks and leaving them there. All the horrible things that can happen from various insects, spiders, snakes, etc. Komodo Dragons... that's "efficient", for the Komodo Dragon... just one bite then waits around for ages for you to die from the horrible parasitic bacteria in their mouth. Okay, I'm going to stop. This goes on and on and on and on. Humans, in media, with advertisers and bosses and careers and audiences and run-times and attention spans etc to consider, tend to depict animals dispatching other animals, biased to the "incredibly efficient" kills. That bias is misleading.
According to a quick search it said the dismembering is a thing which happens in captivity. Maybe sporadically in nature but not common.
You are severely underestimating the pain of heat. Hold your hand above the stove for 0.5 seconds or dip it in hot water very quickly and tell me how nice that was. 40 seconds of that is unbearable. Anything boiling or burning is probably the worst way to go.
Yes, that (
) would be very painful [and I do have a small burn on my thumb from when I slipped and rested the edge of a hot heavy tawa on it for a couple seconds a few days ago ~ so am quite aware], and far short of the burn euphoria one can toggle into when experiencing burns over (so an LLM tells me when I asked for the % since I didn't remember) 20% of the body (~ I could have swore it was more, over 60%). But like I think I alluded to somewhere at least once in this conversation, I don't know if lobsters have a similar flood of endorphins from vast coverage of their body in burns. But it's plausible. I don't know how deep in the evolutionary tree that started, or how consistent a convergent evolutionary trait it is. It's plausible that boiling lobsters could send them off in euphoria. Gets me wondering how this could be tested.
Burns can be biphasic. The dose makes the poison. But like with many a thing studied in toxicology, there may be an upper and lower phase with a middle sweet (or unsweet) spot. Could be that 100% is too much for the endorphins to ... catch up.
But again, I don't even know if lobsters have that at all.