_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2025
708 points (94.9% liked)
Leopards Ate My Face
8464 readers
1337 users here now
Rules:
- The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
- Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
- If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
- Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
- For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
- Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
- This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
- All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.
Also feel free to check out:
Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Those are all irrelevant to guns. None of them are similar problems.
you can see no connection at all between driving licensing and gun licensing?
There is a connection, but also a major difference. Driving isn't a right provided by a constitutional amendment, it's a privilege.
And the constitution clearly calls for regulation, verbatim.
That's the part that is argued because it is written in old English.
Wel gereht here, ðe is neodþearf tō wærienne frēo rīce, þæt riht folces tō habbanne and beranne wǣpna, ne sceal bēon gebrocen.