this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
1028 points (97.2% liked)

Comic Strips

20821 readers
4700 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

All your suggesting to do is to constantly change words the second a corpo co-opts the meaning. That's a losing battle by only retreating.

Your energy would be better used informing people of the meaning of the word and using it correctly, rather than making entirely new words and trying to teach everyone what it means.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I want to see corpos spin "exploitation" into something positive.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It's far from impossible. For example, carnism is a (typically unconscious and unexamined) belief system held by the vast majority of people, and it says animal exploitation, and cruelty and violence against animals can be neutral or even good.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Does it use these terms? When you go shopping, do you sausage packs with any of these terms on the package in a positive way?

"Now with 100% more cruelty! These sausages were produced with extra violence!"

I have never seen any of that. Yes, the system is based on exploitation, cruelty and violence, but these terms are explicitly avoided in any business communication, just because it's impossible to spin them in a positive way.

Instead, meat packaging will show a happy cow on a nice pasture in the mountains, surrounded by untouched, pristine nature. Texts on the packaging emphasize how happy and well-treated the animals are.

There's no trace of high-density indoor farming, live animal transports or slaughter houses on the packaging.

Same with exploitative labour: Look at e.g. the Amazon website. Where do you see anything about them praising themselves for exploiting low-wage workers?