this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
103 points (97.2% liked)

movies

2581 readers
646 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Codpiece@feddit.uk 30 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Well you’ve got to really. The real story of robbing the poor to line the pockets of the rich doesn’t have the same ring to it.

[–] scholar@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Real story? He's a fictional character.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

He’s a character from folklore which is a bit different. He isn’t owned by any one author. He may be based on historical people with certain details embellished or altered, and then more fictional stories added on over time.

His stories do include references to real historical people and events, such as the kings Richard I and John. The 1938 film (starring Errol Flynn) weaves these two into a story about Robin Hood leading a peasant revolt against John, tapping into Anglo-Saxon identity as a form of English nationalism.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

I’m pretty sure they’re saying that this fictional story about a fictional character is necessary be because the true story would be about Bezos and people would hate it.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 5 points 3 weeks ago

He's nearly as real as Jesus

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

He's a fictional character.

Sorta? He's a folk legend, which are often based in reality but highly exaggerated (more and more over time). So mostly yes, but probably at least partially no

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

The Disney Robin Hood movie fucking rips. Everything afterwards sucks.

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 24 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Men In Tights was good for it's time!

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Prince of Thieves with Kevin Costner was also good.

The best Robin Hood film is the one from 1938 starring Errol Flynn. That movie is a masterpiece!

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Man Alan Rickman and Michael Wincott playing off each other was just incredible!

Wincott

Why a spoon cousin? Why not an axe or a sword?

Rickman

Because it will hurt more you idiot!

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yes! Alan Rickman was a true scene stealer in everything he did. I really miss him! RIP

[–] christopher@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago

My favorite Robin Hood!

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Hell yeah. Good call.

[–] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago