this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
7 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

3977 readers
66 users here now

There is no such thing as a Stupid Question!

Don't be embarrassed of your curiosity; everyone has questions that they may feel uncomfortable asking certain people, so this place gives you a nice area not to be judged about asking it. Everyone here is willing to help.


Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca still apply!


Thanks for reading all of this, even if you didn't read all of this, and your eye started somewhere else, have a watermelon slice 🍉.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 4 points 2 months ago

I'll focus on the etymology. I'm aware etymology does not dictate modern meaning, but it helps a fair bit to understand it:

All those three words are from Latin, then they got either inherited or reborrowed by French, then borrowed by English. In all three cases you're getting rid of something, but the "result" is different. This is easier to see by the verbs:

  • annihilō: ad- (to, towards) + nihil (nothing) + -ō. Roughly "I bring to nothing": you had something, now you have zero, it's gone. Like Ratboy Genius saying "there are many things to be erased", he's talking about annihilation.
  • dēstruō: dē- (of/from; in this case reversal) + struō (I put together). Roughly "I unbuild", or "I separate". The pieces are still there, but the build is disassembled. Kind of like when you're building a sand castle and the arsehole of your cousin kicks it, the sand is still there but no castle.
  • eliminō: ēx- (out) +‎ līmen (threshold) +‎ -ō. Roughly "I carry out". Technically the thing still exists, but it's out of boundaries, out of mind. Like the "into the trash it goes" meme, it's elimination.

So no, they aren't homologous. However in some contexts you could replace one with the other. At least in Latin, no idea in English.