Games

22982 readers

192 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

639

Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney argues banning Twitter over its ability to AI-generate pornographic images of minors is just 'gatekeepers' attempting to 'censor all of their political opponents' (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by RetroGoblet79@eviltoast.org to c/games@sh.itjust.works

223 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Sas@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And abuse is a different word than rape. Maybe meditate on that

[+] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works -7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And what if neither happened?

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Dude, you're just wrong. There seems to be a huge disconnect with you between what the law is. And what you want the law to be.

You are not allowed to take an image of someone, photoshop them naked, and distributed it. Period.

You are also not allowed to depict child sexual abuse. It doesn't matter if it's not real. It's the depiction of CSA taking place that is illegal.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago

'This too is a crime, but it's a different crime.'

'Why are you defending this?'

Wrong.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Depictions could somehow be twice as illegal as the real event, and they still wouldn't be the same thing. It literally did not take place.

[–] Walk_blesseD@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago

The nonconsentual sexualised depiction is in and of itself abuse. Get that through your skull, you dense motherfucker. Revenge porn is abuse not necessarily because what it depicts is an act of abuse, but because the material itself is distributed in a manner that violates the consent of the person(s) depicted. Similarly, editing a child's likeness into a pornographic context is CSAM. Making a machine do likewise is CSAM.
Doubling down this hard to say this isn't actually abuse is a really bad look for you and atp I'm convinced that you're a total creep. I'm sure others are, too.