this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
32 points (100.0% liked)
libre
10150 readers
100 users here now
Welcome to libre
A comm dedicated to the fight for free software with an anti-capitalist perspective.
The struggle for libre computing cannot be disentangled from other forms of socialist reform. One must be willing to reject proprietary software as fiercely as they would reject capitalism. Luckily, we are not alone.

Resources
- Free Software, Free Society provides an excellent primer in the origins and theory around free software and the GNU Project, the pioneers of the Free Software Movement.
- Switch to GNU/Linux! If you're still using Windows in
$CURRENT_YEAR, take Linux Mint for a spin. If you're ready to take the plunge, flock to Fedora! If you're a computer hobbyist and love DIY, use Arch, Gentoo, Guix or the many, many offerings out there.
- Those on Apple Silicon Macs can consult Asahi Linux for available options.
Rules
- Be on topic: Posts should be about free software and other hacktivst struggles. Topics about general tech news should be in the technology comm or programming comm. That doesn't mean all posts have to be serious though, memes are welcome!
- Avoid using misleading terms/speading misinformation: Here's a great article about what those words are. In short, try to avoid parroting common Techbro lingo and topics.
- Avoid being confrontational: People are in different stages of liberating their computing, focus on informing rather than accusing. Debatebro nonsense is not tolerated.
- All site-wide rules still apply
Artwork
- Xenia was meant to be an alternative to Tux and was created (licensed under CC0) by Alan Mackey in 1996.
- Comm icon (of Xenia the Linux mascot) was originally created by @ioletsgo
- Comm banner is a close up of "Dorlotons Degooglisons" by David Revoy (CC-BY 4.0) for Framasoft
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments

He should try abusing people on the mailing list again, that should help.
Everyone points to
but don't realize that the only reason that
happened was because Torvalds didn't think he had a right to force other companies to publish their software when he refused to upgrade the kernel to GPL version 3^1.
He literally states that he's uncomfortable with the idea that actual software freedom was above source code. I have no idea why people lionize this man he is literally a reactionary techbro.
I'm willing to guess that most Linux end users' knowledge of Linus Torvalds begins and ends with "he made a thing I like and rely on every day" plus hashtag inspirational posters on FOSS-related Facebook pages plus short decontextualized video clips that portray him much more favorably than he really deserves. So his lionization is basically built by momentum (is that the word I'm looking for?) more than anything else, right? People uncritically imitating what they see as "Linux culture". That's the explanation I'd come up with.
The momentum is from the "Open Source" de-radicalization sphere. Capitalists fed into the open source counter movement explicitly to defang free software, you'll see Linus torvalds in the California computer history museum but not Richard stallman whose work on GCC and the GPL allowed Linux to actually succeed in the first place.
Its the Chomsky effect where torvalds will speak truth to power when it affects him and isn't intentionally trying to be dishonest for selfish gain. But you have to wonder why all the capitalists are happy spreading his name around specifically.
Capitalists love Open Source just like they love "Free Markets." Take a look at any corporate license policy page and take a look at which licenses they leave out (spoiler, all the licenses that compel them to give a shit).
Yeah, I was gonna say, Torvalds gets to have the finger thing as his "moment", while Stallman has the toe thing, right? But God knows Torvalds has plenty of "toe moments", too, so the way they're presented in media doesn't match with their actual contributions and characters.
Stallman is, uh, not without his flaws
I vaguely recall some sort of Epstein thing, yeah. Point is that there are no heroes, only weirdos.
Linus Torvalds' elevation to nerd godhood was only thanks to his relatively private existence in the shadow of Windows and Bill Gates until now.
Linux being an underdog has done well to mislead people into thinking that Linus cares about software freedom or other political ambitions, rather than simply relating to the material conditions in which Linux operates. If Linux and Windows were swapped in market share tomorrow We could guarantee that Linus would direct every developer and his project into producing a carbon copy of Windows 11, just with more C code and penguins.
Even so, the thing that made Linux such an important tool in divesting oneself from Microsoft, will become the thing that makes it easy to divest from the penguin imperialist in chief. There are already binary compatible kernels which are ready to usurp Linux if it does not rid itself of capitalist influence, and many more will follow.
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy: