this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
690 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

79233 readers
3203 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This platform is so incredibly out of touch with reality, especially the more left leaning side of things.

A millionaire these days just means you've paid off your mortgage and have a decent amount put away for retirement.

[–] ScientifficDoggo@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I only half agree with this assessment. Most million dollar homes are million dollar homes due to billionaires and firms poaching housing from actual families and driving up prices.

Idk WHERE we draw the line, but I absolutely say we start culling from the top and see where we land.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The housing market is effed in a lot of places, no argument from me on that. But stringing up someone with a nest egg for their retirement isn't the solution.

[–] ScientifficDoggo@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

Oh, for sure, but I'd bet my goat that the problem would go away WELL before people started looking at single family homes actually owned by families.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That's not true, considering 60% home ownership. How can most homes be owned by billionaires when most people own their homes. Are most people billionaires?

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

They don't need to own all of them, just slightly more than the turnover/growth rate. If a community only has 2% of people moving in/around, and billionaires own 4% of the houses in an area, they can still jack up the prices, which changes the value of all the homes

[–] ScientifficDoggo@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Not what I said my guy.

[–] evol@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Marx himself wrote this long ass book explaining the capitalism of his time, yet modern leftist have no interest understanding the capitalism of their time.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't remember it being that big of a book.

[–] evol@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think all volumes of capital combined are like 1000 pages?

You're probably right. I last read part of it for a class about 35 years ago, and I no longer trust my memory anyways.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 week ago

There's a lot they don't understand, to be honest.