this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2026
927 points (98.7% liked)

Political Humor

1773 readers
88 users here now

Welcome to Political Humor!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nah that's how it was conventionally interpreted (as a collective not individual right). You're giving a c20 reinterpretation and claiming it was original.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not giving anything. I'm just saying how it is currently viewed.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You sure seemed to be implying that that is how it was always viewed ("to change the meaning you need another amendment then"), come on now.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm giving my current understanding of the situation. I didn't come up with either interpretation.