this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
1060 points (97.1% liked)

PC Gaming

13302 readers
275 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Flatfire@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I think they were getting at Flatpaks, Snaps or AppImages (my personal favourite)

[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why do you prefer them to flatpaks? Genuinely curious. I've only used appimages once or twice.

[–] Flatfire@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

They're portable and don't require that I install anything. If I'm looking for an odd tool, it's usually the easiest way to download and test something out. It's just nice to have a standalone executable.

Flatpaks are fine, I really have no problem with them in theory but I spend twice as long configuring them as I do with a native program, and I have to trust that the maintainer is affiliated with the project, which isn't always the case.

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yeah, I was referring to AppImages. But flat packs are cool too, they serve a purpose.