this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
4 points (83.3% liked)

Cartoons and Web Comics

176 readers
56 users here now

Welcome to the ashtray in the corner of the interwebs where the weird strips go when they give up on being normal.

This is where comics show up at 3 a.m. with red ink on their shirt and no alibi.

This comm is creator-friendly. So feel to throw your own stuff into the ring! 'Weird' is better than 'good,' friends! General comics talk is encouraged too.

I'm Buckminster Burkeswood, and I say, "Let's all race to the bottom and freak out Lemmy together!"

What We Want

If it feels like something a bored bartender would laugh at, it probably fits. Weird is good!

What We Don't Want

No external links, only photos with sources. Posting webcomics without linking to original source is not allowed.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Back in 1732, William Hogarth’s A Harlot’s Progress basically lays down a rough blueprint for serial comics, a straight-line story broken into separate images that only really snap into focus when you see how each one leans on the next. Print pirates started cranking out bootleg copies of A Harlot’s Progress in 1732, and Hogarth got pissed enough to haul the whole mess into the legal arena, helping spark the 1735 Engravers’ Copyright Act that people still nickname “Hogarth’s Act.”

The six plates of this early comic follow the life of Moll Hackabout from hopeful arrival in London to death and ruin. Each scene moves the narrative forward, and they're meant to be studied in sequence, plate by plate, like chapters in a visual novel.

The work also uses tools that later become standard in comics. Hogarth repeats characters, props, and spatial arrangements so the eye tracks identity and change across the series.

Great art. The engraving work here is nuts, the kind of slow, obsessive skill that eats whole chunks of a life. Hogarth was hunched over copper, and taken care of shit. He carved lines so clean they still look amazing three centuries later.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Whoa... things got a little weird at the end via the text, but wow, I'd not heard of this series before. Odd, since I'm running a Euro comics project here.

And honestly... I prefer this look compared to the ramming of text willy-nilly in to comic panels over a century later. Then again, I doubt most of those artists had Hogarth's artistic skill, nor freedom to use up as much page-space as he did with these. As in-- they typically had only a panel or two to get the entire message across.

[–] RalphNader2028@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I edited it just now, since my rant at the end has nothing to do with the series. lol I hadn't heard of this until today either. I was looking up the history of comics. He originally did paintings, of this subject, but the got lost in a fire. He also did another series, A Rake's Progress, which I found first, and it's what led me to this one.