this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
39 points (100.0% liked)

Meshtastic

2165 readers
3 users here now

A community to discuss Meshtastic (https://meshtastic.org/docs/introduction)

Other mesh communities:

MeshCore: !Meshcore@feddit.org Reticulum: !Reticulum@mander.xyz

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Seems like a lot of people on meshmap are using medium fast for some reason. At least in California.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I don't know what their specific reasons are, but looking at the meshtastic docs and comparing longfast to mediumfast, they both use the same bandwidth and amount of redundancy (for interference protection) but mediumfast transmits faster than longfast, reducing its range in exchange for faster transmissions, which also clears up the airwaves as people spend less time transmitting - and also increases the capacity of the airwaves (data rate).

One reason I can think of that you would do this is if it's a congested area where there is no shortage of nodes to retransmit, so you might not mind shortening your range if it means less congestion and faster transmissions.

That's just my guess though.

[โ€“] sqweeeeeeee@fosscad.io 7 points 1 month ago

Yeah, when mesh utilization gets too high, the mesh starts having issues because radios can't find an opening to transmit. I've seen a lot of the meshtastic subs for certain cities calling for everyone to switch to medium fast when utilization gets high.

I also keep my pocket mode on client-mute because there are usually much better positioned nodes around to repeat traffic, and mine was just adding to the congestion.