this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
241 points (98.0% liked)

PC Gaming

13302 readers
766 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Looks like the Ghostrunner developers also have an issue with paid mods running off their IP.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 6 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I don't understand intellectual property

I'm asking from a place of curiosity, not a place of judgement. Have you ever created anything? A piece of art, poem or prose, a film, a program, etc?

[–] erin@piefed.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I am an artist who is VERY anti-IP law. The system as it exists is evil and does far more harm than good. IP is not some holy grail that deserves protection when it can be so easily abused. I would rather have no IP law than the current system, but I'll settle for reforms.

[–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

I agree with this.

That said, the prohibition of paid mods should be a cultural matter, not a legal one. It shouldn't be illegal, but we as a gaming community should refuse to engage with them as poor practice

[–] Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Makes me think of all the day care places with Disney characters painted outside the walls…

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Evil is a really strong word that I'm not sure I can get behind here.

[–] erin@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

It's part of an overall system that protects the Haves from the Have-Nots. I consider it evil.

[–] verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Copyright makes no sense. As long as there is a correct citation, it's kosher as far as I'm concerned. 

"This song was originally created by @turdnugget" should be the point of copyright and not the current rent seeking behaviour of the ruling class. 

[–] thymos@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So, what if I wrote a book and got it published, but it didn't sell well. Some big company copies it, puts a lot of effort in promoting it and it becomes a bestseller. I don't get any of the money for it, but they cite me as the original author. How is that fair?

[–] verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You just described academic publishing. 

[–] thymos@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 1 points 1 day ago

You did not describe a copyrightless world, you described academic publishing. On that note, fortunately open access allows the have nots to acquire the same knowledge of the haves. Elabakyan showed how good it could be but the copyright barons had to ruin it for everybody. Furthermore, removal of copyright would curtail the elite's ability to impose a message on the proletariat.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I will extend the same question to you.

[–] verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Plenty of music, still think copyright is stupid.

Attribution, 100%, copyright itself is stupid. 

Now I extend the same question to you. 

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mostly write but have wanted to make a game for a while.

[–] verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Just need to find someone to code? 

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think that's the easy bit. For me at least.

Any sort of artwork is expensive to commission though. And if you're born without a shred of artistic talent in your entire being, you ain't doing it yourself.

So I've got some very broad strokes vision of a game I want to build and I haven't expanded on it further because I know I can't afford to make it.

If I do decide to make it, I'd have to hire someone to do 3D modelling* at the very least. I don't see a world where that's feasible without copyright, because then I'd just be paying someone's salary (or commissions) and be out of pocket for it.

* No, don't worry, I'm not thinking of yet another photorealistic-ish looking 3D game. More like something in the style of the 3D Zelda games or like some of the (MMO)RPGs of the 00s.

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 1 points 2 days ago

No, I'd like to do that myself. Mostly need the time and sufficient motivation. Most of my time is eaten up GMing multiple ttrpgs a week right now.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] SlurpingPus@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In sim racing, Assetto Corsa has tons of paid mods, and simultaneously its developer is one of very few profitable companies. How come Kunos aren't bankrupt from paid mods existing?

[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 6 points 1 day ago

What does that have anything to do with my comment?