this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
1119 points (99.4% liked)

Linux Gaming

23557 readers
1635 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 41 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You don't need GOG galaxy to install and run GOG games. In fact you shouldn't if you care about keeping your games.

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Currently happily using Heroic to manage GOG games. But, I still welcome GOG putting in effort to make it a smooth experience.

You don’t need GOG galaxy to install and run GOG games. In fact you shouldn’t if you care about keeping your games.

Disagree. The fewer barriers to using a game the better. GOG offers full DRM free downloads regardless of Galaxy existing.

[–] cybernihongo@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not using a launcher equals fewer barriers. GOG installers work out of the box with Wine. The whole point of GOG is literally that you can do all of that without restrictions like say... Being forced to use a launcher. So it's not a big deal if Galaxy for Linux isn't around.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes and the DRM free part only matters if you keep a copy of the installer. Galaxy doesn't do that.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

the DRM free part only matters if you keep a copy of the installer. Galaxy doesn’t do that.

Why would that be relevant on Linux? WINE/Proton virtual environments are portable.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

File compression, for starters. A dedicated installer is much easier to bring around.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago
tar -Jcf DIY-dedicated-installer.xz /path/to/wine/bottle

Now you have a very portable, highly compressed file that is easy to move around.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

File compression, for starters.

You can compress folders and entire file systems.

A dedicated installer is much easier to bring around.

For one game, maybe. For a bunch of games an automated backup that collects the entire library and save games is much more practical. There are several easy to use solutions, not to mention scripting if you want really fine grained control.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's some kind of fallacy, I am sure. Just because I want to own my games I must not care about the hassle of installing them? False equivalence maybe?

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have you tried Heroic Games Launcher and found it to be a hassle?

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 14 hours ago

It was indeed quite a hassle, but worth it. That's completely beside the question though

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

wait. why? i use gog galaxy for gog games. and steam for those there. should i be dloading offline installers for gog ones and saving them aside too?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you want the benefit of a DRM game, yes. Otherwise you still don't own the game. GOG has removed games from libraries before and will again at some point in the future.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Which games have they removed from libraries? Typically, these storefronts (including GOG) will remove games from sale, but not from the libraries of customers who already bought them. For instance, they deep discounted WarCraft 1 and 2 before Microsoft requested their delisting, but I've still got them in my library.