this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
556 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

79473 readers
5894 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Gavin Newsom was enthusiastically in favor of forcing the sale of TikTok to US-aligned billionaires under Joe Biden.

Wonder what changed.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 17 hours ago

The reasons why are probably rather "interesting"

There's definitely some "our team, their team" going on, but this isn't really the same thing.

"Following TikTok's sale to a Trump-aligned business group, our office has received reports, and independently confirmed instances, of suppressed content critical of President Trump"

This is not a criticism of the sale itself, but of reported censorship after the sale. Make no mistake, Newsom is still on the side of the billionaires. He just wants the billionaires to return to their progressive facade.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm pretty sure under Biden, it was a matter of Chinese control outside of US government control, not bringing it under US billionaires specifically. Now it's a political instrument of corruption and control, which is something different.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

it was a matter of Chinese control outside of US government control

TikTok was controlled by a private company based out of Singapore, with investments from a host of international funds including both the US and China.

The "China is controlling our internet" narrative was always bullshit fear-mongering, fully disjoined from the actual business structure. What TikTok enjoyed that Facebook and YouTube and Reddit did not was a sufficient distance from US policymakers such that TikTok's policies weren't dictated by Western oligarchs.

not bringing it under US billionaires specifically

That's exactly what Biden (and then Trump)'s forced sale intended. Bring the US branch of TikTok under American control by awarding it to exclusively American financial interests.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

It was the exact same motivation under Biden, they just had the self-awareness to know that they needed to pretend.

[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Likely the consortium that currently bought TikTok does not agree with his political bias, where the Biden one did.

Same with Covid shots, Biden and Kamala were essentially saying that they would not or would hesitate to take "Trump's Covid vaccine." Then, a month later they won, and then had no problem pushing it onto everyone because it was no longer "Trump's Vaccine," buy their own administration's. I can't be the only one that remmebers that.

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

I was barely paying attention back then, things didn't seem so dire at the time.