this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
257 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

79762 readers
3221 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
257
Meta's latest subscription move is an attempt to offset its AI bets (appleinsider.com)
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by tonytins@pawb.social to c/technology@lemmy.world
81 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

On January 26, Meta announced that it was going to test premium subscriptions across its apps. The subscriptions will offer exclusive features and expanded AI tools, while ad-supported versions remain free.

Under the test, users are presented with a clear choice between two paths. People can subscribe to use Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp without ads, or continue using the services for free while agreeing to ongoing data use for advertising purposes.

Meta claims the subscriptions will "unlock productivity, creativity, and AI-powered features," with each app receiving its own set of paid tools rather than a single bundled plan. The company isn't committing to one configuration and plans in order to experiment with different feature sets and pricing models over time.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Seriously? You're gonna pay money to this guy?

[–] xcjs@programming.dev -3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I mean, do I want to give money to a billionaire? Not exactly.

On the other hand, if we don't start supporting premium software services and open source projects, the enshitiffication trend will get worse.

(I know Facebook isn't open source, but I've seen enough open source projects abandoned or enshittified due to lack of support from users.)

I have to choose among my principles, and I'm strongly against user-hostile UI/UX paradigms, enshittification, and other downward quality trends in software/services.

I pay to support my Lemmy instance, for example.

[–] deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They're actively doing enshittifying, though. How are they supposed to know what you're rewarding them for?

[–] xcjs@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago

If it's anything less than I want, I won't be rewarding them at all.

[–] xcjs@programming.dev 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Replying to myself to follow-up.

Listen, I know it's not a popular take, but software projects and services of any size require a sizable amount of effort and time - these projects are vulnerable to acquisition, abandonment, commercialization, and enshittification without support.

  • Linux wouldn't exist as it does without the large amounts of commercial funding it receives because it just so happens to be useful for enterprises and cloud services.
  • Firefox was the shining jewel of the open source community, but even they're struggling with public perception issues and staying true to their original mission.
  • Plex has been under criticism for the last year over various UI/UX concerns and have had developer layoffs as recently as this month.
  • The Affinity series of products have been replaced with a free version that requires a Canva account and will probably become more enshittified as time goes on.
  • How many social media services have come and gone or have had increasing user dissatisfaction as time went on due to enshittification and waning financial stability? Tumblr, Twitter, MySpace, YouTube, Flickr, Facebook, Instagram, and more. The newest bastion is BlueSky, but I guarantee it's just going to become the next Twitter in enough time.
  • Don't get me started on Windows 11.

I'm on Facebook because of the network effect, and if there was a way to encourage it to become a better service, the pricing is reasonable, and if I get what I want - yeah, I'd pay it.

And I'm not speaking from lack of experience - I offered my own social media service for a time that offered privacy and extra storage for a price. Not one user paid, and I had to cancel the project after losing money. Good intentions alone get you nowhere.