this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
273 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

79671 readers
4351 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal@lemmy.today 29 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I am personally rather skeptical about the commercial viability of humanoid robots in 2026, but I suppose that we shall see.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They are just the prototypes to the eventual Slaughterbots that will be deployed into the streets to kill us, and bring us under control.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

I'm sure that's the vision but I'm not entirely sure that Elon Musk is the man to bring it about.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago

He is shifting production to a robot he can't even show a working prototype for. The US taxpayer will be buying some expensive Roombas in 2026....

[–] a1studmuffin@aussie.zone 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I just don't understand who the market is supposed to be for humanoid robots. Manufacturing? They've already built bespoke task-centric robots. Consumers and businesses? They can already hire a real person without spending money upfront to "purchase" said person. I just don't see the use case. It feels like another metaverse or smart glasses. Just another desperate grab at investor money and trying to claim the next "big thing".

[–] tal@lemmy.today 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I mean, human environments are intrinsically made for humanoids to navigate. Like, okay, we put stairs places, things like that. So in theory, yeah, a humanoid form makes sense if you want to stick robots in a human environment.

But in practice, I think that there are all kinds of problems to be solved with humans and robots interacting in the same space and getting robots to do human things. Even just basic safety stuff, much less being able to reasonably do general interactions in a human environment. Tesla spent a long time on FSD for its vehicles, and that's a much-more-limited-scope problem.

Like, humanoid robots have been a thing in sci-fi for a long time, but I'm not sold that they're a great near-term solution.

If you ever look at those Boston Dynamics demos, you'll note that they do them in a (rather-scuffed-up) lab with safety glass and barriers and all that.

I'm not saying that it's not possible to make a viable humanoid robot at some point. But I don't think that the kind of thing that Musk has claimed it'll be useful for:

“It’ll do anything you want,” Musk said. “It can be a teacher, babysit your kids; it can walk your dog, mow your lawn, get the groceries; just be your friend, serve drinks. Whatever you can think of, it will do.”

...a sort of Rosie The Robot from The Jetsons, is likely going to be at all reasonable for quite some time.

[–] a1studmuffin@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

I guess the point I was trying to make in my original post is - say we invent human robots tomorrow - what's better about them than actual humans, which we already have an unlimited supply of? It just seems like a god complex thing to me, not really solving any major problems for humanity.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

How many times has Musk promised technology actually appeared?

He killed his EV company just as EV sales were taking off worldwide.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

You should check out this news story. It gives a lot more detail about their Atlas robot.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

The plan is government contracts and kickbacks to Trump.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The military and DHS will buy them up like hot cakes i bet. Coming soon to a street corner near you. My question is will they be armed with 5.56 or 7.62?

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

I smell Iron Man 2 plot.
But why has it become reality?

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You should see just how far Boston Dynamics has progressed. They’ve been working on it for literally decades, and it shows. They may have humanoid AI robots working in automotive assembly lines within a year or two:

[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If it's taken Boston Dynamics decades it's going to take Elon Musk centuries.

[–] hardcoreufo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Move fast, and kill all humans.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

They may have humanoid AI robots working in automotive assembly lines within a year or two

Bullshit. Cute dance videos are not actual productivity, and the most recent video shows a B-D -Robot barely taking a large part of a large self and dropping it into a rack. Stuff one armed robots already do.

Watch the videos: they always distract with cute waves and dancing but no way will these toys replace skilled labor.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doubt. There was FT article about robots efficiency in factories with title.

Robots only half as efficient as humans, says leading Chinese producer

https://archive.ph/Gzi41

Robots in this and next deade will be big flop. It will be like with VR from 80s and 90s

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 2 points 1 day ago

It won't matter if they're cheaper.

People are very expensive.