this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
28 points (96.7% liked)

Bicycling

3226 readers
1 users here now

A community for those who enjoy bicycling for any reason— utility, recreation, sport, or whatever!

Post your questions, experiences, knowledge, pictures, news, links, and (civil) rants.

Rules (to be added on an as-needed basis)

  1. Comments and posts should be respectful and productive.
  2. No ads or commercial spam, including linking to your own monetized content.
  3. Linked content should be as unburdened by ads and trackers as possible.

Welcome!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Video so text summary needed.

[–] ambitiousslab@feddit.uk 7 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The person in the video shows this graph, or a very similar one.

She highlights the different categories between swimmers, fliers, runners and vehicles.

Then, she reveals the "human on a bicycle" entry on the graph and says that humans on a bike are much more efficient than anything else.

[–] JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Very interesting. I wonder why a horse is so much more efficient than a rodent. Something to do with size and limb mechanics I guess. Would be nice to know what the dot underneath "automobile" is, I'm guessing "bus".

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago
[–] faultyproboscus@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

I think the math checks out for this graph.

If a human on a bicycle consumes 0.15 calories per gram per kilometer, then a 100 kg person would be:

100000g x 0.15 calories = 15,000 calories = 15kcal

I'm guessing these numbers are for a racing bike on a flat stretch of smooth road where you don't need to brake or accelerate.