this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
932 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

79671 readers
4000 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/59469059

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So couldn't patreon just argue in court that this precedent was already set with epic?

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is how case law works, yes.

[–] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm just wondering then why Apple would even push this if a president was already set with Epic. What a bunch of greedy corporate bastards.

[–] other_cat@piefed.zip 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Expecting Patreon to not want to bother fighting them over it, and they are correct in that assumption.

On Wednesday, Patreon said Apple has renewed its requirement that all Patreon creators must move to subscription billing. The deadline to do so is November 1, 2026.

Edit, adding my source: https://www.engadget.com/big-tech/patreon-creators-have-to-switch-to-subscription-billing-by-november-thanks-to-apple-203759852.html

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I'm not a lawyer but I think they could.