this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
759 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

79574 readers
3975 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/59469059

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 3 points 29 minutes ago

Choose another payment method. Choose another platform - web based? - where these fees don't apply. Hell, buy a throwaway droid phone to keep your money from apple's greedy hands.

[–] Bongles@lemmy.zip 4 points 49 minutes ago (1 children)

Hasn't this type of thing already been litigated?

[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world 6 points 34 minutes ago (1 children)

Yes it has, but now, all of our consumer protections have been obliterated

[–] quips@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 minutes ago

What is the intended enforcement mechanism?

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 42 minutes ago

Gotta recoup all those fascist donations

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

"Walled garden initiates universal tollbooth policy overhaul."

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Makes me think why ever since Photoshop was first created, Apple became the go-to for creatives for decades, and now Apple thinks it wants more money than just the fanatics going after their latest product.

[–] stellargmite@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

Apple screwed their pro market anyway. Sometime back . The history with apple and creatives relates more to print history I’d guess . Adobe needs to be ditched , and is in some areas. Windows is a shitshow as we know. There are lessening reasons to be wedded to either Mac OS or Windows as they continue to enshittify and I for one welcome it.

[–] Hawanja@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yet another reason to never ever use Apple. So if I just use the Patreon website and not an app, do I still have to give Apple 30% of my money? Seems like that should be illegal.

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Thats exactly how it works for twitch and other stuff. If you're on mobile go to the website instead of the app otherwise they take a cut

[–] Petter1@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 hour ago

Many apps either only sell on website or just make it 30% more expensive when paid via app
That is long the case

[–] Dewege@feddit.org 55 points 7 hours ago (6 children)

To follow this logic: if you use an e-banking app, Apple will soon claim to be entitled to 30% of all transactions. Same for paypal, ebay, you name it

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 6 points 4 hours ago

Well call it tithe for your digital overlord.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] gaymer@aussie.zone 14 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

People need to stop buying apple products. So many controversies and still people keep buying apple products. Its like people really dont care about ethics , environment and other human beings. Oh wait......

[–] Sine_Fine_Belli@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

It’s just that there are only a few companies that sell products that apple also sells

[–] MortUS@lemmy.world -2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (3 children)

Right, the alternatives are sooooooooooo much better. Googles track record is on point , android for the win.

Getting rid of Apple entirely would be like removing Coke from the beverage marketplace. It just allows the competition to worsen and consumer choice to be less.

Apple > Google as a company in every moral category

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 1 points 27 minutes ago

I like Grapheneos.

[–] gaymer@aussie.zone 8 points 5 hours ago

I see you're a gaymer too. Let's gooo. Defend trillion dollar companies at all costs. Gayme on!!

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 5 points 5 hours ago

~~>~~=

They are both shit.

[–] jenings@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] can@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Not good.

There have been countless threads on the subject.

https://lemmy.world/post/42124818

https://mander.xyz/post/45953148

https://sh.itjust.works/post/46320374

https://reddthat.com/post/49485312

And so on. Sorry for the non instance-agnostic links.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 34 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Just crank all iOS user payments up by 30%, explain why, and let nature sort itself out.

[–] Tilgare@lemmy.world 23 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Apple doesn't allow this - they expect your price to be the same everywhere or they'll remove the app from their store or decline version updates. There have historically been a few high profile exceptions privately negotiated, and I think they were forced to relax this in the last year or two, but here they are again trying to claw away money they did literally nothing to earn.

[–] Spezi@feddit.org 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Instagram puts way more than 30% on their ads when purchasing through iOS

If you buy 100€ of ad budget, they want you to pay an additional 42.5% apple service fee and additional taxes here in Germany.

If I do it through their ad center suddenly the taxes are already included in the budget so if I pay 100€ I get 100€. So in the end, Meta charges iOS users an additional 70% vs what they usually charge.

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Are you purchasing ad space through Meta or Apple in the no fee scenario?

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 hours ago

I have an app which reduces the quality of the app for apple users to force them to subscribe more than Android users.

The price is the same, but on android there's no limit to the number of saves you can keep whereas Apple has a limit of 5 and you need to Subscribe at $30/year to unlock more saves.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

They would all be screaming shut up and take my money.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 15 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Patreon gives creators the option to either increase their prices in the iOS app only, or absorb the fee themselves, keeping prices the same across platforms.

It's already an option and if you read the article, only 4% are still on the legacy billing system (no Apple tax at all)

iOS users using a browser don't pay the Apple Tax. And the only reason to pay through the app is if you specifically want to use Apple Pay (e.g to pay with your phone bill instead of your credit card).

At this point it's a "stupid tax" more than anything.

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Small clarification. Apple Pay is not really paying with your phone bill. I think you can but most users just have their credit card or debit card linked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] network_switch@lemmy.ml 27 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Terribly need degoogled android to become popular and/or a normal Linux distribution phone to become popular so that normal Linux market share couldn’t be ignored

[–] ptu@sopuli.xyz 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

New Jolla Phone will start shipping in 2026 H1

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Is this one fully open source? Or is it still "well open source when we can"?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LifeLikeLady@lemmy.world 45 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

If I was on Patreon I'd tell them to pull the app. Fuck em they have a website.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Right? You'd think Patreon would throw their weight against Apple, as this is clearly not in their best interest. Threaten to pull the app, and if Apple follows through, they get nothing. Alternatively, move payments entirely outside of the app and force Apple to either do something which is guaranteed to be extremely unpopular, or call their bluff. But they won't do these things or even try to negotiate Apple's cut.

Apple may appear to swing the biggest dick here, but I am so disgusted by these weak companies just immediately bending over without a fight.

As always, it's the creators who will be faced with hardship, but neither entity seems to give a shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 48 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I fucking hate mega corps. It's never fucking enough... Ever... Apple has more money than some countries yet these assholes want ever more....

Tax all these assholes into oblivion!

[–] zen@lemmy.zip 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

"Don't hate the player, hate the game." – Karl Marx

[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I reserve the right to hate apple regardless, thank you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 69 points 15 hours ago (11 children)

What exactly does Apple think that they're brining to the equation in order to deserve that 30? Is it simply that they're hosting an app on their store, so therefore they're entitled to a cut?

So if I write a novel, and get it published, Microsoft can say "We deserve 30% because you used our product to produce your product?

I'm so fucking tired of corporations. It's well past guillotine-o-clock.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›