this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
933 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

79671 readers
3933 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/59469059

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 45 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Last time this came up Patreon simply allowed the creators to charge the commission directly on top of the price for non apple users, or eat the 30% loss. So everyone not using iOS would pay, say, $5/month, iOS users would pay $5+30%. Hope they retain that option.

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (4 children)

That's actually a good solution

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Is it? Previously this was considered tips

Now it’s 30% for what? Running a payment gateway and hiding an unsubscribe button deep in the App Store UI.

Competitively payment gateways charge 1-3%, but when you lock down a platform you can charge 10x that.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It’s logical but it probably scares away some customers. That’s why the “just eat it” option exists. iOS gives you access to an enormous market and payments are slick and easy. Creators may want $5 but if they can get 30% less from 500% more people, it’s still a good business for them. There’s no strict reason why they must obsess over taking 100% of the sticker price. There are a million examples of businesses who are willing to accept a discount for high volume business.

[–] other_cat@piefed.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not that good, the backlash was immense and if I remember right, people were dropping patreon subs over it.

EDIT: I might also not be remembering right. The thing I'm thinking of was an additional fee regardless of what platform you used to access Patreon.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah, I remember cause my Patreon account asked me what I wanted to do about apple trying to steal my money

p.s. I never push Patreon so have no subs lol

Ya a few apps already do this. YouTube premium does for sure and I have heard a few others doing so.

[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Your math is wrong. If you want the creator to still get $5 with apple stealing 30% you would need to pay ~43% extra.

$5/0.7 = $7.14

1/0.7 = 1.42857

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

I don't remember the math, there was a button to charge apple users more so we got what we were supposed to