this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2026
14 points (93.8% liked)
Technology
1359 readers
39 users here now
A tech news sub for communists
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
AI for coding is very useful, assuming you're already a senior dev. It allows one senior dev to replace four or five junior devs, ultimately annihilating the market for junior devs. Unlike junior devs, senior devs already know how code should run, so verifying the AI isn't an issue. Instead of senior devs having to "waste time and productivity" training junior devs, senior devs can instead spin up four or five AI agents and supervise them, commanding them to write the code and then review the code at the end.
Now, the question arises, "what will happen when these senior devs retire?" There is no answer to that. The idea is by that time, all dev work will be replaced by AI.
This logic doesn't really track in my experience. Hiring junior devs was never about writing production code. It's an investment with the understanding that a junior will develop into an intermediate and senior in the future. It generally takes more time to mentor a junior and review their code than to simply code it myself. In addition, doing it myself will certainly result in higher quality, scalable, maintainable code.
This is the contradiction. Many seniors are seeing their productivity decline, because being forced to use AI is like mentoring 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 etc. juniors. The AI doesn't improve based on your individual mentorship making this a different type of "investment", if you can even call it that. This isn't about productivity or investing in labour. It's about creating a system by which the value of your labour power can be reduced.