this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
288 points (99.0% liked)

Fediverse

39535 readers
1200 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just thought I'd note this. Main beneficiary so far seems to be piefed.ca.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

"Amateur speculation". I've directly replied to many people who have made false conclusions about parts of the code they looked at, mostly notably the claim that continues to persist that lemmy.ml is also defederated out of the box based on a complete misunderstanding of a specific code snippet.

[–] goferking0 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Love that the respose ignores every point just deflects again to a completely different topic

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Saying some are doing amateur speculation is not the same thing as saying anyone who has issues are "amateurs".

[–] goferking0 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Except that is exactly how it reads.

ignore everyone else looking at the code because they're amateurs as we're the only professionals here

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

That's simply not how I read it at all. He's referring to people taking excerpts from the code and running away with long conclusions and motives based in some cases on presuppositions and assuming bad intent.

[–] goferking0 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It reads as being upset anyone would dare read it. Especially with replying to the person pointing it out they wouldn't review anything they thought was intentional coded in a particular way.

Note this is completely separate from by stance after reading some of the code and stance of the level of it.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I simply do not share this interpretation of his comments at all.

[–] goferking0 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I know, but you also can't see anything but positives from anything they do

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

And I can say the reverse to you. You interpret every decision made in the worst possible light.

[–] goferking0 1 points 9 minutes ago (1 children)

Because I'm a cynical pet and keep seeing odd decisions made along with language that 80% of the time points to bad things.

[–] Skavau@piefed.social 1 points 4 minutes ago (1 children)

Having actually interacted with rimu more than you, I think it's reasonable I simply dismiss your position here.

[–] goferking0 1 points 1 minute ago

Which again doesn't change how others would perceive the language used.