this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
449 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

79762 readers
4203 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 26 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Theres a ton of other things I want my TV to do before more pixels.

Actual functional software would be nice, better tracking on high speed shots (in particular sweeping landscapes or reticles in video games) higher frame rates and variable frame rate content, make the actual using of the tv, things like changing inputs or channels faster, oh man so much more.

Anything but more pixels.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 hours ago

I still probably watch 90% 1080p and 720p stuff lol. As long as the bitrate is good it still looks really good.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 10 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Actual functional software would be nice

you do not want software on your TV.

[–] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, yes and no. I like e-arc, and I like being able to adjust settings other than v-hold. But I don't want this slow crud fest that keeps telling me when my neighbour turns on Bluetooth on their iphone.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I like e-arc,

... the audio hdmi thing?

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I want software on my TV.

Steam Link specifically. I like streaming to my TV via Ethernet.

[–] nile_istic@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You can do that with a Raspberry Pi for <$100 and without the need to have Amazon/Google/Roku/whoever tf else collecting your data.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Who says I let Amazon/Google/Roku/whoeverTfElse collect my data?

I have my TV isolated to its own network and allow inputs from LAN, so i can use Steam Link and Jellyfin just fine.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

So get a device that can do that. You didn't need a piece of software that will never see an update to do this.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

It's funny that you think smart TVs don't receive updates. It's got a wifi chip for a reason.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 1 points 7 minutes ago

Tvs can last 20 years you'll be lucky to get 2 years of updates

[–] Lenggo@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I have a Samsung frame because I wanted a TV that didn't look so much like I had one, but the software is so goddam bad. The only way to switch sources quickly is to set them as a favorite which isn't always that straight forward if you didn't do it right away. Regardless you have to let the the home page fully render before you can even worry about that. Even the Samsung TV app which you would think would be perfectly optimized for the hardware since the same compare makes the software is barely functional and loads like a web page on AOL in 1998

[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

I like my frame because it faces a set of windows and with all my other tvs ... I would have to close the blinds to see the tv in the day time.

However, the software is straight garbage. I didn't even know about the favourite thing ... every time I change source it would spend like a minute or two trying to figure out if it could connect to it for no reason.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Couldn't any TV be a "frame tv"

Would you just need some trim?

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 1 points 5 hours ago

No, not really