this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
97 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

5770 readers
269 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

But is it game over for 8K on the PC, too?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's because we're at the limits of the human visual system. The difference in pixel pitch between 4k and 8k at the distances we watch TV is literally imperceptible.

It also doesn't help that there's not much content authored and distributed for higher resolutions. It's exponentially more expensive to produce, store, and deliver.

Home Internet connections on average aren't any better than they were ten years ago, either, at least not in the US. I doubt a lot of them can even support 8k streaming, let alone with anyone else using it at the same time.

Most of them can't really even support 4k streaming at a bitrate that is significantly better than 1080p.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

They have been saying that since 30hz and they still say that with 240hz

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 hours ago

Yeah but we're talking diminishing returns here. Doubling the resolution to 8k makes about as much sense as doubling refresh rates to 480hz. At that point it's going to be mostly dependent on the individual, and likely heavily subject to the placebo effect.

By my math, a 55" 8k screen has pixels that are 0.056" (56 thou) wide.

At ten feet, that subtends an angle of 0.268 degrees or 1.6 arcminutes.

There's obviously a lot of variation and it depends on exactly what you're measuring, but normal human visual acuity struggles to distinguish details less than about 5 arcminutes, maybe 1-2 arcminutes depending on the test.