this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
628 points (100.0% liked)

People Mastodon

307 readers
418 users here now

People tooting stuff. We allow toots from anyone and are platform agnostic (Mastodon, BlueSky, Twitter, Tumblr, FaceBook, Whatever)

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

that's like saying my source is in a book in the library. not really useful

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well when the whole book is about that one thing…

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The one that was linked. I know it’s not a book. I was using your own analogy.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

are you aware what analogies are?

you didn't link a book, but the whole library.

[–] athatet@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay so then again. It doesn’t matter what book I choose as a source. They are all about what the post is about.

[–] mitchty 1 points 15 hours ago

So cite which documents support the claim. If it’s so easy it shouldn’t be hard to do. You’re basically replying to a statement of that’s illegal and being asked to cite what is illegal by saying reference all of the legal caselaw. It may be technically correct but it’s useless. There is a reason academics and legal scholars say reference paragraph x of book y etc. if you can’t provide easy examples why would I buy your claim?

Put up or shut up.