this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
670 points (99.1% liked)
THE POLICE PROBLEM
4880 readers
872 users here now
The police problem is that police are policed by the police. Cops are accountable only to other cops, which is no accountability at all.
99.9999% of police brutality, corruption, and misconduct is never investigated, never punished, never makes the news, so it's not on this page.
When cops are caught breaking the law, they're investigated by other cops. Details are kept quiet, the officers' names are withheld from public knowledge, and what info is eventually released is only what police choose to release — often nothing at all.
When police are fired — which is all too rare — they leave with 'law enforcement experience' and can easily find work in another police department nearby. It's called "Wandering Cops."
When police testify under oath, they lie so frequently that cops themselves have a joking term for it: "testilying." Yet it's almost unheard of for police to be punished or prosecuted for perjury.
Cops can and do get away with lawlessness, because cops protect other cops. If they don't, they aren't cops for long.
The legal doctrine of "qualified immunity" renders police officers invulnerable to lawsuits for almost anything they do. In practice, getting past 'qualified immunity' is so unlikely, it makes headlines when it happens.
All this is a path to a police state.
In a free society, police must always be under serious and skeptical public oversight, with non-cops and non-cronies in charge, issuing genuine punishment when warranted.
Police who break the law must be prosecuted like anyone else, promptly fired if guilty, and barred from ever working in law-enforcement again.
That's the solution.
♦ ♦ ♦
Our definition of ‘cops’ is broad, and includes prison guards, probation officers, shitty DAs and judges, etc — anyone who has the authority to fuck over people’s lives, with minimal or no oversight.
♦ ♦ ♦
RULES
① Real-life decorum is expected. Please don't say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.
② If you're here to support the police, you're trolling. Please exercise your right to remain silent.
③ Saying ~~cops~~ ANYONE should be killed lowers the IQ in any conversation. They're about killing people; we're not.
④ Please don't dox or post calls for harassment, vigilantism, tar & feather attacks, etc.
Please also abide by the instance rules.
It you've been banned but don't know why, check the moderator's log. If you feel you didn't deserve it, hey, I'm new at this and maybe you're right. Send a cordial PM, for a second chance.
♦ ♦ ♦
ALLIES
• !abolition@slrpnk.net
• !acab@lemmygrad.ml
• r/ACAB
• r/BadCopNoDonut/
• Randy Balko
• The Civil Rights Lawyer
• The Honest Courtesan
• Identity Project
• MirandaWarning.org
♦ ♦ ♦
INFO
• A demonstrator's guide to understanding riot munitions
• Adultification
• Cops aren't supposed to be smart
• Don't talk to the police.
• Killings by law enforcement in Canada
• Killings by law enforcement in the United Kingdom
• Killings by law enforcement in the United States
• Know your rights: Filming the police
• Three words. 70 cases. The tragic history of 'I can’t breathe' (as of 2020)
• Police aren't primarily about helping you or solving crimes.
• Police lie under oath, a lot
• Police spin: An object lesson in Copspeak
• Police unions and arbitrators keep abusive cops on the street
• Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States
• So you wanna be a cop?
• When the police knock on your door
♦ ♦ ♦
ORGANIZATIONS
• Black Lives Matter
• Campaign Zero
• Innocence Project
• The Marshall Project
• Movement Law Lab
• NAACP
• National Police Accountability Project
• Say Their Names
• Vera: Ending Mass Incarceration
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I don't think so, happens all the time in the U.S.
Do you know what a "false dichotomy" is? What you said doesn't address that.
Here's an example:
"The only types of footwear are boots and sandals."
"That's a false dichotomy; people can wear other shoe types."
"I don't think so, people wear boots all the time."
My comment was specific to the U.S. Police do not make us safer. That's my opinion. You are free to have a different opinion. I think you're wrong.
Your use of a false dichotomy is not an opinion, it's a fact. Having an opinion about a fact just means you're confused.
If I said there are no shoes other than boots and sandals and you disagreed, that doesn't make my "opinion" equally valid and worthy of respect, it just means I'm confused.
Arguing that it's a false dichotomy makes me think you don't actually care, you're just trying to win an internet argument.
It's been all over the news in recent weeks that ICE outright executed people in the street. And it's commonly known that police in this country shoot first and ask questions later as policy.
I can only assume you think we can reform the police in it's current form (which is not true), or you're a troll. Doesn't matter which, I'm not gonna keep arguing with you.
I'm not arguing that it's a false dichotomy any more than I'm arguing that the Earth is a planet. I can point it out, but you can just as easily simply shut your eyes and plug your ears.
If you don't know that what you said was a false dichotomy (or more accurately, refuse to confirm it by doing a quick web search for what the term means), that's on you.
If you think someone pointing out a logical fallacy you made means "they're just trying to win an internet argument," that's on you. It sounds like you're extremely resistant to constructive criticism, which is a personal growth issue you should probably take a hard look at.
I'm not your teacher and I'm not your dad. You either care that you're making critics of police look stupid or you don't.
True and completely immaterial to this discussion no matter how times you keep Red Herring bringing it up.
A blatant lie. Can you point out a single agency in the US that has such a policy?
It's a lot closer to true than what you've been saying.