Chapotraphouse

14307 readers

760 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net

khizuo@hexbear.net

thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net

CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net

198

Waymo turns out to be using remote operators from the Phillipines (futurism.com)

submitted 1 month ago by corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

44 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Always had a suspicion, but its nice to know that you can just generally assume the worst about a technology these days.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's definitely not a 150ms minimum.

Depending on the technology used, latency could reasonably be below 60ms. Really depends on a lot of factors.

[–] DasRav@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How would it be anything less then 150ms between LA and the Philippines? 150ms is already assuming pretty much perfect conditions.

[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe it's just me interpreting 'latency' as being one-way.

[–] DasRav@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

That would make sens.e You have to factor in round-trip time because if the car sends video at 75ms to someone, even if they instantly react with zero delay, their reaction now has to travel back the same 60ms of time/distance before the car can act on it.