this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
1089 points (99.2% liked)

Work Reform

15792 readers
11 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Stoping a union is a one off cost.

Increasing wages adds to costs for every future year.

[–] udon@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you spend hundreds of thousands once, you could instead spend a dollar each on 100 employees for ~80 years. They don't work that long usually, but just in case

[–] MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Your math is right but scales are off.

Dollar raise a year? Yeah, $1 * 100 * 80 = $8000, and to a lot of businesses that's peanuts. It's also peanuts to the individual employees, if you work full time federal minimum wage you make $15600, an extra dollar wont make a difference there.

Increase hourly wage by a dollar, to the employee that's an extra 1 * 40 * 52 = $2080, and to the business that becomes $1 * 40 * 52 * 100, that's $208,000 annually they're paying out.

That's what they aim to stop

[–] udon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

True, although I was at a dollar raise a month. The framing in the story was purposefully "I just ask for sth. very small" so that's how I read it. Dollar raise per hour is much more meaningful, but quite a significant increase